I have read J. P. Holding's "refutation" of my critique of Lee Strobel’s The Case for Faith. I actually confess that some of his points showed weaknesses in my prior presentation. I have revised the portions that I feel needed revision based on his comments. At least as of this time, he has not updated his comments per my latest edition, so I believe his "refutation" is out of date. But you can read it for yourself if you like.
Response to Tektonics - Part 1 (Response to Holding's "Refutation")
Response to Tektonics - Part 2 (Continuing the debate with Mr. Holding via the TheologyWeb.)
Response to Tektonics - Part 3
Response to Tektonics - Part 4
Response to Tektonics - Part 5
Response to Tektonics - Part 6
Response to Tektonics - Part 7
Response to Tektonics - Part 8
Response to Tektonics - Part 9
Response to Tektonics - Part 10
Response to Tektonics - Part 11
Response to Tektonics - Part 12
Return to Strobel critique - Table of Contents
